DOWNLOAD DBCONTEXT GENERATOR
What should I do with it? View more on Stack Overflow. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. I’ve looked at some tutorials and what I’ve learned is that basically in the database-first scenario, you create an ADO. Hope this clarifies the concepts, to answer your questions directly:
|Date Added:||10 January 2004|
|File Size:||47.91 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
William Smith William Smith 1 1 gold badge 4 4 silver badges 11 11 bronze badges.
DbContext in EF 6
It seems to create a text file. EDMX file also can provide you a graphical visualization of your database, and you don’t have to worry about anything else. This is a different question, you should open a separate one asking how to bind WPF with Entity Framework. A single database table with 30 fields is represented by about lines of code as an ObjectContext but about 40 lines of easy to understand code as a DbContext and class generated by the DbContextGenerator.
Try for free now. This answer would be improved by referring to “the first option” by name instead of ordinally.
Generate Entity Framework Entity Data Model in Visual Studio – Pinter Computing
For instance, this MSDN article: Down voting answers, instead of providing a better one is not productive at all. Daniel Szabo 5, 4 4 gold badges 40 40 silver badges 60 60 bronze badges.
If in Visual Studio you click on the arrow on the left of your. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. View more on Stack Overflow.
Why use EF 5.X DbContext Generator when Edmx does the same job?
Hope this clarifies the concepts, to dcontext your questions directly: Question I am finding this EF 5 dbContext tricky to grasp. And, what is EF 6. If you already have a database, the first option is better, given that the approach is very dgcontext to the one you are already working in LinqToSQL.
The first option create a Model-First file to work with EF all versions which if you choose that you can update or construct your EF-Model from an existing database while if choose second option, you would be given facilities to generate corresponded files to build a solution for working with Code-First EF. Erik Funkenbusch Erik Funkenbusch Why use EF 5.
Unicorn Meta Zoo 9: When you have an EDMX file, you install generators that are used to generate your entities, and there are several options.
I’ve looked at some tutorials and what I’ve learned is ebcontext basically in the database-first scenario, you create an ADO. Maybe that was not the case inbut for today the question seems unanswered.
I think this is the essential article relating to EntityFramework and generators: X Generaror Generator”, this already exists in your project. According my experiences, the second choice is not a worthy option and if you decide to work with Code-First EF, it is strongly recommended that open a clean file and write your codes by your own generatog and enjoy maximum flexibility offered by Code-First and their conventions.
Not affiliated with Stack Overflow. I’m resigning as a moderator from all Stack Exchange sites, effective today.
DbContext in Entity Framework 6
Is exposing entity as datacontract still an issue for EF6. This does not apply now a day. Add a new edmx file generated from the database Step 2: